Platform Comparison

How Statixs compares to general-purpose HR software for regulated workforce environments.

Feature Comparison

General-purpose HR platforms handle standard HR well but lack the compliance capabilities CQC-regulated care providers need.

Feature
Statixs
From £5/user
BrightHR
£4/user
BambooHR
£6/user
Ciphr
£8/user
CQC Regulation 17 Governance Evidence
Included
No Reg 17 governance module found
Not CQC-specific
No Reg 17 governance module found
Governance Operating Layer
Risk register, action plans, assurance packs
No Reg 17 governance module found
Not CQC-specific
No Reg 17 governance module found
CQC Compliance Reporting
Included
Not CQC-specific
Not CQC-specific
Not CQC-specific
Staff Scheduling with Compliance Enforcement
Included
Included (shifts & rotas)
Via integrations (Marketplace)
Via integration (rostering partners)
Training & Credential Tracking
Included
LMS available (BrightLearn)
Training tracking + compliance training (EasyLlama)
LMS module available
DBS at Government Cost
£49.50, no markup
DBS tracking (processing price not stated)
Background checks via partners (no DBS-at-cost offer stated)
3rd party DBS (Experian/TrustID)
HMRC RTI Payroll
Included
RTI submissions (FPS/EPS) supported
UK payroll via local integration (e.g., Xero UK)
HMRC recognised RTI payroll
Right to Work Verification
Included
RTW evidence fields (in-product)
Not confirmed (UK right-to-work workflow)
RTW checks & evidence (partners)
Setup Fee
£0
Implementation fee applies (Payroll packages)
One-time implementation fee/cost applies
Activation fee 10% + services
Enforcement Decisions
Included
Not available
Not available
Not available
Audit Trail
Included
Payroll audit logs
Included (Payroll)
Included

Detailed Analysis

BrightHR

Strengths
  • Low base price
  • Simple HR basics
  • Mobile app included
Limitations for Regulated Environments
  • No CQC-specific features found
  • DBS tracking available (no DBS-at-cost offer stated)
  • Not care-specific
  • Scheduling not care-compliance specific

BambooHR

Strengths
  • User-friendly interface
  • Good HR features
  • Established platform
Limitations for Regulated Environments
  • No CQC-specific compliance found
  • No care-specific features
  • Scheduling via third-party marketplace integrations
  • Background checks via partner integrations only

Ciphr

Strengths
  • Comprehensive HR suite
  • Advanced reporting
  • Good support
Limitations for Regulated Environments
  • No CQC-specific features found
  • Module-based pricing adds cost
  • Not care-specific
  • Implementation complexity

Why Regulated Environments Need Purpose-Built Software

DBS at Government Cost

Enhanced DBS checks at £49.50. Exact government rate, zero markup. Third-party DBS processing typically costs significantly more.

DBS Checks Guide

CQC Compliance Built In

Compliance tracking, evidence mapping to fundamental standards, and inspection readiness are part of the core platform, not an expensive add-on.

CQC Compliance Guide

Governance Operating Layer

Risk register, action plans, assurance packs, and governance reviews, built around CQC Regulation 17. General-purpose HR platforms are not built for CQC-specific governance.

Governance operating layer

HMRC RTI Built In

Payroll with Full Payment Submission, Employer Payment Summary, P60, and P45. Variable hours, agency workers, and leave all feed into the same payroll cycle.

HR Operations

When General-Purpose HR Software is Appropriate

  • Standard HR operations: BrightHR, BambooHR, and Ciphr are good at standard HR functions like contracts, holiday tracking, and basic rotas. For non-regulated businesses, they may be sufficient.
  • No compliance overlay needed: If your organisation does not operate under CQC or similar regulatory frameworks, purpose-built compliance tools are unnecessary.
  • Dedicated compliance team: Large organisations with separate compliance departments may handle CQC requirements independently of their HR platform.
  • Where Statixs is different: Statixs is built for care providers where compliance is not separate from operations. DBS status, training credentials, staffing baselines, and governance decisions are part of daily workflow.

Comparison Questions

Look, Person Centred Software is a solid product - they've been around for years and lots of care homes use them. But you're probably paying £26-30 per user per month once you add scheduling, compliance, and training modules. That's significantly more expensive than Statixs for essentially the same features. What you get with both: CQC compliance tracking, staff scheduling and rotas, training record management, DBS application handling, mobile apps for staff. Where Statixs is better: Price - from £5/user (51–100 staff) to £7/user (1–25 staff) all-in vs £26/user with add-ons. DBS cost - £49.50 exact vs £65-70 with markup. Where Person Centred might be better: If you're heavily integrated with other Person Centred products, switching might be disruptive. Honest take: For most care homes, Statixs delivers the same value at a fraction of the cost. Book a demonstration and see if you actually need those expensive extras.
Nourish has good scheduling - we'll give them that. Their rota system is pretty intuitive. But here's the thing: Scheduling comparison: Both have drag-and-drop rotas, shift pattern templates, conflict detection, Working Time Regulations alerts, staff availability requests, mobile app for staff to view rotas. Price comparison: Nourish: £12/user base + £6 compliance module = £18/user minimum. Statixs: £6/user for 26–50 staff with all compliance included. For 50 staff: Nourish = £900/month, Statixs = £300/month. Where Nourish gets expensive: Add-on modules for advanced features, setup fees of £1,000–1,500, complex pricing that makes budgeting difficult. Real talk: Nourish's scheduling is good, but you're paying a significant premium over Statixs for essentially the same functionality. That's £600/month (£7,200/year) extra for a 50-person home.
Care Control targets large NHS trusts and care groups with complex organisational structures. Care Control strengths: Detailed reporting and analytics, extensive integration options, handles complex multi-site structures. Care Control limitations: Steep learning curve, significant implementation costs (£1,500–2,000 setup fees), higher per-user pricing (£18/user). Where Care Control may be appropriate: Large NHS trusts with complex reporting needs, organisations with dedicated IT teams who can manage configuration complexity. Where Statixs is different: Purpose-built for CQC-regulated care environments with compliance intelligence, DBS at government cost, and all features included from the start. No setup fees, no module add-ons.
Yep, and it's honestly a bit shameful. Government DBS cost (official rates): Enhanced with Barred Lists: £49.50. Basic/Standard: £23. These are the prices charged by the Disclosure and Barring Service directly. What competitors charge: Person Centred Software: £65-70 Enhanced (£15-20 markup). Nourish Care: £60-65 Enhanced (£10-15 markup). Care Control Systems: £62-68 Enhanced (£12-18 markup). What Statixs charges: £49.50 Enhanced (exact government cost, zero markup). Why this matters: Care homes do 10-20+ DBS checks per year. At £15/check markup × 15 checks = £225/year competitors are pocketing. Over 5 years = £1,125 in unnecessary markups. Why we don't mark up DBS: We think it's wrong to profit from mandatory legal requirements. You're already paying us £5/user for software - we don't need to squeeze extra profit from compliance costs. It's the principle of transparent pricing vs hidden markups. Some might say "it's only £15," but multiply that across hundreds of care homes doing thousands of DBS checks annually, and competitors are making millions from these markups while telling you they're 'including' DBS in the platform.
Honest answer: Yes, a few scenarios: If you're already heavily integrated with a competitor's ecosystem - For example, if you use Person Centred's care planning software, electronic care records, and family portal, switching just the HR component might create headaches. If you need very specific niche features - Some competitors have specialized modules we don't (yet). Like if you need advanced workforce analytics with predictive staffing models, Care Control might be better. If you're a massive NHS trust with 1,000+ staff - You might need enterprise features and dedicated account management that comes with expensive software. If you want an established brand - Some procurement departments feel safer buying from 20-year-old companies rather than newer entrants like Statixs (founded 2020). If you have unlimited budget - If cost genuinely doesn't matter, you might prefer the most expensive option assuming it's the best (not always true). For 95% of care homes though: Statixs delivers everything you need at a fraction of the cost. We're not trying to be everything to everyone - we're focused on being the best value HR and compliance platform for typical UK care providers. If you fall into one of those edge cases above, fair enough. But most homes will save £5,000-20,000 annually by switching to Statixs without losing any functionality they actually use.

See Statixs in your environment

A demonstration tailored to your compliance requirements.